A hard line on China is worth the "backlash."

Posted by scapozzola on 08/17/2012

Kudos to Alex Roarty at National Journal for analyzing the contradictory stances on China of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney and his new VP running mate Paul Ryan.

As the Alliance for American Manufacturing's (AAM) Executive Director Scott Paul pointed out yesterday, it's hypocritical for Paul Ryan to give a speech calling for a hard line on China when he has previously opposed legislation to penalize Beijing for its illegal currency manipulation.

Roarty's analysis suggests that China is so important an issue, that the Romney campaign will take the risk of Ryan being a flip-flopper:

That the Romney campaign, which surely knows Ryan's voting history, sent him to make a China-centric speech anyway indicates how important the country looms as an issue in November. Bashing Obama over China is too potent an attack, particularly among blue-collar voters anxious about the country's economic rise, to pass up. It's why, in 2010, a litany of congressional campaigns deployed the tactic so frequently.

AAM recently conducted a bipartisan national poll to determine voter attitudes toward China, outsourcing, etc.  The findings showed that, across the board, voters favor tough action on China.

Specifically:

1.       62% of voters favor a  “get tough” approach with China, as opposed to only 29% who say we should be careful not to “start a trade war.”
2.       When asked if voters had heard about China manipulating its currency, 58% had heard vs. 40% who had not heard.
3.       When asked if China’s currency manipulation had cost American jobs, helped create U.S. jobs, or had no effect: 64% said it cost jobs, 11% said no effect, 1% said had created jobs.
4.       When asked if voters had heard about China cheating on trade agreements, 58% had heard vs. 40% who had not heard.
5.       When asked if China’s cheating on trade agreements had cost American jobs, helped create U.S. jobs, or had no effect: 68% said it cost jobs, 10% said no effect, 2% said had created jobs.
6.       When asked about enforcing trade laws to support a level playing field, 91% of voters were in favor.
7.       When asked about penalizing nations such as China that manipulate their currency and cheat on trade agreements, 83% were in favor.

Read more.

Related recent Blogs

@KeepitMadeinUSA on Twitter

  • If the United States wants to maintain its "rising star" manufacturing status, it must do a few key things: http://t.co/yVBTFyywYF 14 min 45 sec ago
  • That's right: the U.S. is a "rising star" in manufacturing. But there's more to do to increase our competitiveness: http://t.co/yVBTFyywYF 1 hour 29 min ago
  • .@BCGPerspectives says the United States is among the "rising stars" in global manufacturing. Here's our take: http://t.co/yVBTFyywYF 2 hours 13 min ago
  • Great @AP Q&A w/ @papergirlmacy on Factory Man: "When I write about economics, I write from the ground up." http://t.co/WSVs14gt2N 2 hours 59 min ago
  • RT @RachelBSAAM: If you're attending the #NCSLSummit stop by booth 940 for a one of a kind @KeepitMadeinUSA root beer opener. http://t.co/Q… 3 hours 26 min ago
  • "China is among several economies whose manufacturing price advantage over the U.S. is eroding..." http://t.co/BWfE2tsk7l 3 hours 33 min ago
  • But we also hear Titan Gilroy will be grand marshal at the MAVTV 500 IndyCar World Championship next weekend! http://t.co/EXu7cRLieL 3 hours 40 min ago
  • Titan Gilroy is bringing the #MadeinAmerica message to @MAVTV this fall: http://t.co/9hLE5Hko72 3 hours 40 min ago
  • Back to School Shopping? Be sure to check out our #MadeinYourCity Back to School Guide: http://t.co/daOUtQmAqK 1 day 29 min ago
  • What will happen if America doesn't invest to rebuild its infrastructure? Somebody else will: http://t.co/4e7vGqOrSz 1 day 41 min ago